Revision control
++ # QDoc expects the bracketed version clause first: `\value [since X] Name
++ # Desc`. It then annotates the item with the version that introduced it.
++ # Placed after the name or the description instead, the clause is not a
++ # clause at all: QDoc records no version and renders the bracket literally
++ # as description text. QDoc never warns about the clause either way, so a
++ # misplaced one goes unnoticed. See docparser.cpp, case CMD_VALUE:
++ # `getArgument()` reads only the token immediately after `\value`, so a
++ # `[since X]` anywhere else is never recognized, no matter how it got there.
++ extends: existence
++ message: "QDoc ignores this '[since ...]' clause; it must immediately follow the command: \\value [since X] Name Description."
++ link: https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/10-qdoc-commands-tablesandlists.html#value-command
++ level: error
++ scope: 'text & doc(p)'
++ # The accepted vocabulary is matched unanchored against the whole span this rule
++ # reports, so an accepted word anywhere inside the match would suppress it --
++ # `Qt` in `\value Qt::ImhHiddenText [since 6.4]`, for one.
++ vocab: false
++ nonword: true
++ raw:
++ # This scope sees the converted text, where the `\value` token is already
++ # gone and the name is masked to a run of `*` the same length as the name.
++ # A correctly placed clause (`\value [since X] Name Desc`) is consumed
++ # before the mask is emitted, so the mask is never followed by `[since` in
++ # that case -- only a misplaced one produces this adjacency. Match the
++ # mask, never a `^` anchor: anchors do not bind inside a narrowed block,
++ # and every raw pattern needs a literal to survive MightMatch.
++ - '\*[ \t]+\[[Ss]ince'